🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a new playlist titled Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this mode resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but features several key changes:

• Each team includes only eight real players, with the remaining filled by AI-controlled opponents.
• Activities performed by human gamers grant complete experience points, while bot actions provide reduced XP.
• Just a pair of maps can be played: Siege of Cairo and Empire State map.
• Features like Dogtags, achievements, and stat tracking have been turned off.

So essentially, this mode delivers on its title: it's a laid-back version of Breakthrough. On the surface, one could assume there's nothing wrong, as it gives more options for players looking for alternative methods to have fun with the title. However, gaming history have taught us anything, it is that you can't please everyone. In other words, a lot of Battlefield 6 players are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Praise

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the errors of your competitors," reads a response to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking idea," comments another. At the same time, in community forums, a player remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this game," while someone else details all the issues they consider to be problematic in Battlefield 6: "Resolve glitches, fix drone glitch, correct rocket mechanics, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, fix awful hit registration. We do not require this bot mode."

On the other hand, for every complaint, there are players sharing how much they're liking the new mode. "It's enjoyable to warm up, real players keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," says a forum post. "The community doesn't understand that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this title all the time. Let them find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply via social media explains that as they're "a battledad with limited time, this is perfect for me," while another praises the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Concerns and Player Input

All that said, there are constructive reasons to complain about Casual Breakthrough. A few folks have highlighted that it could increase queue times even longer for other modes due to the sheer number of playlists in the game already. On a similar note, certain regions often face mostly bots in the current modes. Additionally, it appears somewhat counterintuitive that the mode won't start without a required amount of real players, even though it focuses mostly on fighting AI opponents.

Lastly, a major complaints is that a previous feature was promised to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they tried to eliminate XP farming from the system. Thus Casual Breakthrough feels like the player base meeting them in the middle, as per forum feedback. Another labels this addition as the devs "making a mistake so hard, I had so much fun in the first couple of days, why did they feel the need to adjust it?"

Looking Ahead: Will Changes Be Made?

If Battlefield Studios has demonstrated something to date with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and acting on player input. Assignments that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, just like the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, should analytics shows this recent mode isn't performing to their expectations, they won't be shy to make further modifications.