🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the Britain, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. As time has passed, an observance that was initiated as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a corporate feel, growing to encompass events where individuals of African heritage are paid to talk to Caucasian groups about hidden biases and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. However, that period has concluded. The surge has peaked, resulting in a somewhat empty inheritance of what promoting consciousness is for.

The History of Black History Month

Originally observed in the US and Canada, Black History Month was created in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by historian of African descent Carter G. Woodson with multiple days of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month developed from this movement and was formally inaugurated in 1970. Today it is observed not only in the US and Canada in the second month, but also in October in the Britain, Germany, the Republic of Ireland and the Netherlands.

The observance has developed since its inception, giving reduced attention to the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in government, the arts, and social movements, and extensively acknowledging the contribution Black people have made to shape the country. It is in educational institutions where Black History Month is most frequently marked, with talks and cultural events. But the method the celebration is commemorated is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it progresses is a good lesson in how co-option leads to erosion: the restructuring of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how critical it is to rethink Black History Month more than the specific period in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a reemerging right-wing in the form of the Reform organization is top in opinion ratings. In the summer we observed the most significant ultra-conservative gathering in British history. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the right-wing political group, is a firm opponent of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a legislator feels empowered to declare that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, ultra-nationalist movements are expanding in the European continent as a whole.

In the America, a massive attack against diversity initiatives and positive discrimination has been taken, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the highest courts of the nation. A drive to scrub Black history and experience from the archives is under way. One of the former president's first executive orders aimed at the institution dedicated to Black heritage, and the prestigious establishment, claiming they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the celebration symbolises how little it can be effective if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of former accomplishments, rather than addressing the situation of the contemporary world. It also demonstrates how its short period means that it is separated from the wider consistent effort that is necessary. An academic expert, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she raised concerns about the short-term symbolic gestures of the observance. “The problem with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a driver of transformation.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for equal rights and acknowledgment in such moments of dejection and worry is a challenging endeavor. There is a inclination to just eliminate observances such as Black History Month entirely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an period that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and indeed, including corporate presentations – form an framework that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, deteriorates), but to be a vital organism.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month seem? Well, first, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is dispersed through the year (as some institutions are already commencing), elements of its material (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into academic syllabi. It would also be a time that does not evade politics, and allows opportunity for citizens, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What value has basic knowledge of the past when it ignores the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Organizations who observe it should not be pacified with the non-confrontational words of “unconscious bias” and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. To summarize, Black History Month should be made contemporary, pressing, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Contemporary Black History Month.